Shot in the dark
Too many people still vehemently protest rigid gun control, and it’s killing America.
Every year, the lack of gun control laws in the United States results in thousands of gun-related deaths and injuries.
For being such dangerous objects, guns are easy to obtain. While background checks are required to purchase a gun, the requirement applies only to in-store purchases. Less than one percent of background checks actually result in a denial. Furthermore, in some states, background checks are not required to purchase a firearm at a gun show or from online vendors, which presents a safety liability.
An increasing amount of gun violence has occurred in recent years, some of which can be attributed to the lax policies on obtaining guns. According to the GVA (Gun Violence Archive), which monitors statistics for gun violence within the United States specifically, there were over 52,000 incidents involving gun violence in 2015, with 330 mass shootings recorded. These numbers reflect an increase of about one percent in incidents of gun violence, and .85 percent in mass shootings (defined as a shooting where four or more people are killed) from 2014 records. While this may not seem like an alarming increase, putting the actual numbers into perspective sounds alarm bells.
Last year, 13,354 people were killed in gun-related crimes. There were 330 mass shootings over the course of the year. Six-hundred-and-twenty-nine children and 2,371 teenagers were victims of gun violence. People are being injured and dying at an unnerving rate due to gun violence.
Many specific examples of the terrors of gun violence occurred throughout 2015. A mass shooting occurred almost every day in 2015. Some of the most “notable” mass shootings were those in Charleston, Chattanooga, Colorado Springs, Roseburg, and San Bernardino. All of these shootings resulted in the deaths of multiple people, with fourteen people killed and twenty-two others injured in the San Bernardino shooting alone.
This deadly amount of gun violence can be curtailed, however. Take, for example, Australia’s restrictive gun laws. Contrary to popular belief, Australia’s laws are not a complete and total ban on guns; rather, the restrictions regulate the purchase, possession, and use of firearms. Since the strict regulation of firearms went into effect in 1996, after a devastating massacre in Port Arthur where 35 people were killed and another 18 were injured, the number of deaths related to firearms declined 47 percent. In similar terms, firearm suicides have decreased 15 percent since the enactment of the stricter gun laws in Australia.
Too many people, (looking at you, Republican Party), feel as though the enactment of gun laws will not have an impact on the amount of gun violence in America. They believe that criminals do not purchase guns legally to commit their crimes, which is true, to an extent. However, impulsive crimes, or crimes committed by amateurs, occur often in daily life, (around thirty people are shot and killed every day) and in these scenarios, legally purchased firearms are often the culprit. If a firearm is readily available in someone’s home, an impulse crime committed due to anger or frustration certainly becomes a greater risk. People are still able to purchase firearms with almost no waiting period, (and none if purchased at a gun show), and from that moment on, the weapon becomes susceptible to use in a violent crime.
Furthermore, even when guns used to commit crimes are not legally purchased, the fact of the matter remains that guns are too readily available to criminals. Even if the weapon was not legally purchased in the first place, but illegally manufactured, illegally sold, and used in a violent crime, the situation still remains that guns are too easy for American citizens to obtain. Sure, you can never prevent the illegal manufacture and sale of bootleg firearms; however, by cracking down on the proliferation of guns in the United States, the government could put a significant dent in the amount of violent crime committed with firearms.
Australia had a “best-case” scenario in terms of the results of their gun control laws. Still, the implementation of any sort of gun control in America would certainly aid in preventing the numerous injuries and deaths related to gun violence. The United States accounts for less than five percent of the world’s population; yet, it holds an average of 42.5% of the world’s entire arsenal of firearms. The United States has the highest number of homicides by firearm out of the most developed countries in the world.
I do not live in an ideal world where controlling the purchase, possession, and usage of guns ends all instances of gun-related violence. I understand that, regardless of any laws that are or aren’t enacted, gun violence will still be an issue the modern world has to face. However, strict regulation of the sale of any firearm could potentially save thousands of lives every year, and to many people, including myself, that is reason enough to fight for more gun control.
We are a little over a month into the new year. There have already been over 3000 incidences of gun violence in the United States. There have been seven mass shootings. Over 800 people have already been killed, and just over 200 of those people were children under the age of 18. The countless injuries and deaths each year related to gun violence are senseless and completely preventable. I am not calling for the end to all human rights in America, nor am I calling for complete government control over the lives of the American people. What I am calling for is an end to the senseless injury and murder of thousands of people every year.
Is that so much to ask for?
Hello! My name is Jordyn White and this is my first year on the Stinger! I have always loved writing, and, I plan on majoring in English in college. Due...
Student • Feb 10, 2016 at 11:05 pm
Are you sure Great Autismo?
http://www.factcheck.org/2015/10/gun-laws-deaths-and-crimes/
Even if you are right, I find fallacy in your last statement. I do not see how gun control can enact the ending of lives. Perhaps it prevents the populace from defending themselves as ably, but it is the aggressor that causes the deaths, not the lack of guns. It is rather difficult to die from the lack of a firearm. Also do realize, that guns don’t kill people either. People kill people.
A student • Feb 10, 2016 at 5:36 pm
In regards to the comment about oppressive governments:
I don’t believe this article never calls for a ban on assault rifles or any other kind of gun.
Also, government military forces in developed countries are far better trained and equipped than any individual. This article talks specifically about placing further restrictions in the US, and our situation is far different than third world countries run by warlords where access to guns might be helpful.
The Great Autismo • Feb 10, 2016 at 5:09 pm
This is true, but once again you are avoiding the larger issue: Democide (look it up). Please use your statistics to demonstrate how a complete ban on assualt weapons will prevent mass democides; then I will respect you as a contributing member of society.
Jordyn White • Feb 10, 2016 at 2:39 pm
All of the facts that I used in my article are cited in hyperlinks throughout. The facts are controversial, sure, but, this is a controversial topic, and, therefore, the facts may seem controversial and not everyone will agree that they come from reputable sources. It’s all a matter of opinion. Therefore, because this article is an Op-Ed, the facts I cited were indeed used to supplement my argument on the situation. I very much appreciate the feedback and analysis of my Op-Ed, and if you have any major concerns please send an email to [email protected]. Thank you!
The Great Autismo • Feb 10, 2016 at 11:17 am
I would, but it would clearly be a waste of my time. I am sure you are fully capable of using search engines, as evidenced by your apparent expertise in Californa State laws. As Mrs. Kennedy says, there are three types of lies: lies, white lies, and statistics.
Student • Feb 10, 2016 at 1:50 am
Please cite contradictory facts that prove the facts of this article at odds
The Great Autismo • Feb 9, 2016 at 6:34 pm
This article would be much more convincing if your facts and blatant accusations were true. You overlook that in many first world countries after strict gun control laws were enacted, although the gun murder rate declined significantly, the total murder rate remained almost unchanged (ie the UK’s stabbing rate went through the roof). You spew statistics, numbers, and raw emotion without putting any serious thought or analysis into what you are saying. In the last century, 260 MILLION people were killed by their oppressive governments. The holocaust and holodomor would have been much different had the victimized people had ‘illegal assualt weapons’. So, you tell me: who kills more people: guns or gun control?
Alexandre Czajka • Feb 9, 2016 at 6:12 pm
The lack of regard for editorial ethics in this article is appalling. I’m very disappointed in our school’s journalism team…
Mary kienitz • Feb 8, 2016 at 8:56 am
A good article, but please check your facts. Research the gun control laws in the state of California.